we do not currently plan to have a v2 anytime soon. Lets just merge the v1
namespace into the main one.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
To make their purpose clearer, rearrange our state: we now have the row-based
array on the top level, instead of every member being an array on its own. The
name of the state variable was changed to `matrix_state_`, to reflect its
purpose. This also allowed us to have its members be named `current`,
`previous`, `debouncer` and `masks`.
All devices using these APIs, and the documentation were updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
We want `readCols` as a separate function, so we can tell the compiler to apply
different optimizations to it.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
This is a typedef that defines what type we need to use for storing row states.
Defaults to uint16_t. For boards with 8 columns or less, we can use `uint8_t`,
but the default is 16 bits.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
This makes it easier to initialize them in the cpp (shorter too!), and reduces
code size as well. It's also a bit simpler to understand the initialization
part, because it's no different from the props init.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
On the `Upper` layer, we used to have a macro that moved us back to the QWERTY
layer. It was made before we had `MoveToLayer` available. Now that we do have
it, lets use that instead of the macro.
We still keep the macro around, for the sake of compatibility, so that if anyone
who has the old macro in EEPROM, but updates the firmware, will have the key
working still.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
On the `Upper` layer we have a key that takes us back to the QWERTY layer. That
key appeared as `M(QWERTY)` on the keymap, while `QWERTY` was the layer name,
and `LAYER_QWERTY` was supposed to be the macro name. In the macro itself, we
used `Layer.move(LAYER_QWERTY)` - the macro name instead of the layer name.
In practice, this didn't matter, because both ended up resolving to `0`, but the
code did not reflect intention, and was confusing for anyone trying to
understand what's going on.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
Due to the introduction of MCU properties recently, we need to declare the class
for virtual builds, and can't get away with simply typedefing it to Base.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
When using the A* pinouts, the bootloader should - by default - be Caterina, not
HalfKay, which should only be used for the legacy Teensy2 pinout.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
This drops the now unused `ATMEGA32U4_KEYBOARD`, `ATMEGA32U4_DEVICE_PROPS`,
`ATMEGA_KEYSCANNER_PROPS`, `ATMEGA32U4_DEVICE`, `ATMEGA_KEYSCANNER_PROPS`, and
`ATMEGA_KEYSCANNER_BOILERPLATE` macros.
These were macros that made the code less verbose, but none of them were
future-proof, and all of them were pretty opaque. Using them did not help one to
understand the code.
All use of these have been changed to use the raw structures as-is, which is
more verbose, but much more extensible, and a whole lot clearer in intent
aswell.
Since these are not particularly user facing macros, I opted not to include them
in `UPGRADING.md`, and removed them without prior deprecation.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
Instead of using opaque macros which aren't even extensible, just expand them,
and use the raw data structures for the hardware definition. While this is more
verbose than the macros, it is more future proof, and clearer for the reader
too, because they don't need to understand the magic macros.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
Instead of using opaque macros which aren't even extensible, just expand them,
and use the raw data structures for the hardware definition. While this is more
verbose than the macros, it is more future proof, and clearer for the reader
too, because they don't need to understand the magic macros.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
Instead of using opaque macros which aren't even extensible, just expand them,
and use the raw data structures for the hardware definition. While this is more
verbose than the macros, it is more future proof, and clearer for the reader
too, because they don't need to understand the magic macros.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
Instead of using opaque macros which aren't even extensible, just expand them,
and use the raw data structures for the hardware definition. While this is more
verbose than the macros, it is more future proof, and clearer for the reader
too, because they don't need to understand the magic macros.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>
Instead of using opaque macros which aren't even extensible, just expand them,
and use the raw data structures for the hardware definition. While this is more
verbose than the macros, it is more future proof, and clearer for the reader
too, because they don't need to understand the magic macros.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <algernon@keyboard.io>